Don’t Sacrifice Data, Business Value for Financial Transformation


What is financial transformation, and is there something new in the term that matters to organizations wanting to transform digitally?

If one looks back at the history of information technology — prior to the coining of the term “digital transformation” — IT was predominantly focused upon back-office automation and the extracting of cost from these business processes. To a large degree, this wave of IT investment was responsible for much of the business productivity gains over the last 50 years.

However, with the advent of digital transformation thinking, the focus for IT shifted to the front office and to using digital technologies (social, mobile, analytics, cloud, and internet of things) to transform customer experience and increase the business value delivered to customers. In digital transformation, the technology directly impacts business models — how organizations make money and deliver value to its customers. Digital transformation, also, results in digital offerings that create new, digital value propositions.

In an introductory conversation with a new friend, she said that her fiancée’s job was about “financial transformation.” I respond politely that was an oxymoron. Her initial response was to laugh and then she said it really is a made-up term.

But this left me wanting to know if others using the term. And more importantly, what is financial transformation, and is there something new in the term that matters to organizations wanting to transform digitally?

Defining Financial Transformation

According to Steven Krueger at Ernst and Young, “In the face of unprecedented digital innovation, resource constraints and pressures for cost reduction, the demands on finance operations and technology to modernize have never been greater.” He goes on to say, “Finance is in a perpetual state of transition, and leaders are struggling to effectively align talent with the barrage of demands. All the while CFOs and CIOs are being asked to modernize finance, reduce cost, provide resiliency and strengthen controls with less budget.”

Without question, Kruger says, “Organizations are evolving at record pace as digital transformation continues to drive prevailing changes across the front, middle and back offices. Shifts in consumer preferences are driving incessant product innovation to enable increasingly frictionless and convenient user experiences in the race to protect or create competitive advantages.”

Given the above business change, proponents of financial transformation claim the finance function needs to operate at a speed that matches the front-office. Innovations that are taking place there are putting increased pressure on the back-office operations.

For example, as organizations shift to more agile ways of working and launch unprecedented volumes of new products and solutions, organizations continue to rely on legacy operating financial models with rigid development cycles and overburdened resources. As a result, finance and IT teams can’t address the system and process ecosystem fast enough. With business teams chasing new revenues and business models, finance shouldn’t become a blocker — rather they should become a transformation enabler.

Related Article: Digital Trailblazer: Drive Consequential Digital Transformations

The CIO Response

So, the business case is that operationally, functions need to modernize in order to better support agile, digital organizations. What do CIOs think? The responses varied.

Joanna Young, who is a former Michigan State University and Liberty Mutual CIO and who did a stint as AVP of Finance, said, “What this is like is spinning straw into gold. Is there an API for that?”

Pedro Martinez Puig, CIO for Payments Processor Edenred, said, “Definitely this is not an ostensible self-contradiction, but a compelling real opportunity to make finance’s operating model cope with the rapid pace of startups and native digital models. For me, financial planning, budgeting and forecasting are a great starting point.”

Providing a business justification, Miami University CIO David Seidl says, “I think the transition from CAPEX to OPEX is a real thing, and that it is changing financial models. For example, historical chargeback models are worth changing.” Agreeing, Manhattanville College CIO Jim Russell says, “For organizations with strained budgets and significant physical deferred maintenance, they still need time to swap OPEX for CAPEX. But there is more to it than swap or legacy practices.”



Source link

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Logo
Reset Password
Shopping cart